JY Ko Advocates & Solicitors

Kuala Lumpur High Court Victory: Private Caveat Removal

Another High Court Victory: Successful Removal of Private Caveat Over RM1.28 Million Auction Property Kuala Lumpur High Court Allows Our Application Under Section 327 of the National Land Code 1965 11 November 2026 | JY Ko Advocates & Solicitors | Civil Litigation and Property Disputes We are pleased to announce another significant litigation success following

Kuala Lumpur High Court Victory: Private Caveat Removal Read More »

JY Ko Wins Tenancy Dispute in Malaysia | Court Victory

Court Victory in Malaysia Tenancy Dispute: Landlord Awarded RM38,400 in Rental Arrears, 8% Late-Payment Interest and Holding-Over Damages 29 October 2026 | Kuala Lumpur | Tenancy Disputes and Commercial Litigation We, JY Ko Advocates & Solicitors is pleased to announce a favourable Court decision obtained on behalf of our client, a commercial property landlord, in

JY Ko Wins Tenancy Dispute in Malaysia | Court Victory Read More »

jy ko lawyer

Contractor Negligence Malaysia: RM2.02 Million Cable Damage

Contractor Ordered to Pay RM2.02 Million for Damaging Underground Cables: High Court Explains Negligence and Compensation Case Analysis: TM Technology Services Sdn Bhd v Mangkubumi Sdn Bhd [2026] CLJU 3390 Shah Alam High Court | Judgment dated 10 September 2026 1. Introduction: A Construction Accident Resulting in a RM2 Million Claim Can a construction contractor

Contractor Negligence Malaysia: RM2.02 Million Cable Damage Read More »

jy ko lawyer

When ‘30 Years’ Does Not Mean 30 Years: Court of Appeal on Contract Expiry and Renewal

Court of Appeal: A Contract Stated to Last 30 Years May Still Expire Earlier – Lessons on Renewal, Vacant Possession and Damages Case Commentary: Vigilant Ventures Sdn Bhd v Lembaga Kemajuan Ikan MalaysiaCourt of Appeal Malaysia | Civil Appeal No. K-01(NCVC)(W)-391-07/2023Decision dated: 24 June 2026 A commercial agreement states that the parties intend for their

When ‘30 Years’ Does Not Mean 30 Years: Court of Appeal on Contract Expiry and Renewal Read More »

Owed Money Does Not Mean You Can Caveat the Property

Successful Orders to Remove a Private Caveat and Restrain Further Caveats Over Our Client’s Property Today, we are pleased to share a significant outcome achieved for our client in a recent property dispute before the Kuala Lumpur High Court. The case concerned the use of a private caveat to secure payment of a disputed monetary

Owed Money Does Not Mean You Can Caveat the Property Read More »

Successful Further Evidence Application in Court of Appeal

A Significant Appellate Development: Court of Appeal Clarifies the Need for Leave to Adduce Further Evidence A recent appeal handled by our firm has resulted in an important procedural clarification concerning the adducing of further and new evidence before the Court of Appeal. We are pleased to share a significant development arising from proceedings before

Successful Further Evidence Application in Court of Appeal Read More »

Payment of Rent Alone Does Not Prove a Tenancy – Successful Appeal Outcome

Can Rental Payments Alone Prove a Tenancy? High Court Says No On 4 August 2026, the High Court in Shah Alam dismissed the landlord’s appeal in its entirety and upheld the Sessions Court’s judgment after a full trial. The High Court also awarded RM5,000 in costs against the Appellant, affirming the dismissal of the landlord’s

Payment of Rent Alone Does Not Prove a Tenancy – Successful Appeal Outcome Read More »

Successful Striking Out of Claim for Property Agent Fees

Kuala Lumpur Magistrates’ Court Allows Striking Out Application with Costs in Favour of our Client (Defendant) We, JY Ko Advocates & Solicitors are pleased to share another successful litigation outcome after the Magistrates’ Court in Kuala Lumpur allowed our client’s application to strike out the plaintiff’s claim on 24 July 2026, with costs of RM2,500

Successful Striking Out of Claim for Property Agent Fees Read More »

High Court Grants Stay of Proceedings Under Section 10 Arbitration Act 2005

Successful Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration in Shah Alam High Court The Shah Alam High Court had on today allowed our client’s application to stay court proceedings pursuant to Section 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005, with costs of RM3,000.00 awarded to our client. This decision reinforces Malaysia’s strong judicial policy of respecting arbitration

High Court Grants Stay of Proceedings Under Section 10 Arbitration Act 2005 Read More »