Corporate Mismanagement Case Law: WA Skills Training Malaysia v. Nurain & Peter John Cooke
Introduction
The recent decision in WA Skills Training Malaysia Sdn Bhd v. Nurain Binti Mohd Sakirin & Peter John Cooke [2025] CLJU 492 by the High Court of Malaya offers critical insights into director’s duties, fiduciary breaches, and corporate governance lapses. This case illustrates how mismanagement, lack of transparency, and conflict of interest can culminate in significant legal consequences, particularly when directors and employees misuse their positions for personal gain.
Background
WA Skills Training Malaysia Sdn Bhd (“the Plaintiff”) is a company incorporated to facilitate vocational training services in collaboration with WA Skills Training Pty Ltd (WAST), an Australian entity. Nurain Binti Mohd Sakirin, a former employee of WAST, later became a director and employee of the Plaintiff. Her husband, Peter John Cooke, was formerly the COO of WAST and relocated to Malaysia to oversee the Plaintiff’s operations.
WA Skills Malaysia received funds from CIDB Malaysia and WAST to conduct training programs. The plaintiff alleged serious misconduct by both defendants, including unauthorized withdrawals, misappropriation of funds, and breaches of fiduciary and statutory duties.
Key Allegations
The Plaintiff’s case centered around several serious allegations:
- Failure to account for funds: RM773,695.61 from CIDB and AUD128,373.08 from WAST.
- Unauthorized transactions: RM610,014.38 withdrawn from the company’s Hong Leong Bank account, RM10,000 in directors’ fees, and a salary increment of RM112,500.
- Negligence and breaches of duty: As a director and employee, Nurain allegedly failed to maintain proper records and misused company resources.
- Conspiracy: The Plaintiff claimed that both defendants conspired to injure the company by misappropriating funds and removing vital documents.
Defendants’ Defence
The Defendants argued that:
- The shareholder agreement did not apply to WA Skills Training Malaysia.
- The funds used were for operational expenses, including training costs and logistics.
- The Plaintiff lacked locus standi, as the action was allegedly brought without proper shareholder authority.
Court’s Findings
Validity of the Shareholders’ Agreement
The Court dismissed the claim that the shareholders’ agreement was inapplicable merely because it referred to a slightly different company name. Testimonies confirmed that only one company was incorporated in Malaysia, and all shareholders, including Nurain, had acted on the basis of that agreement.
Breach of Duties and Misuse of Funds
The Court found that Nurain:
- Breach of Contractual and Fiduciary Duties: Failed to account for both CIDB and WAST funds. Her claim that the money was used to secure the CIDB contract was illogical, as the contract was already in place.
- Unauthorized Payments: Engaged in unauthorized withdrawals, payments for personal expenses, and raised her salary without Board approval.
- Failure to Maintain Records: Ignored repeated requests from auditors and company secretaries to submit essential documents.
Peter John Cooke was found to have abetted and conspired with Nurain in misappropriating the company’s assets.
Conspiracy to Injure
The Court accepted the plaintiff’s evidence of conspiracy, confirming the elements:
- A combination between the two defendants.
- Intent to injure the company.
- Execution of acts pursuant to the conspiracy.
- Resulting loss to the plaintiff.
The Court ruled that sufficient facts and material evidence were presented to substantiate the claim for conspiracy.
Locus Standi and Corporate Action
The defendants argued that the plaintiff had no legal standing as the claim should have been initiated via derivative action. The Court rejected this, holding that the majority directors (PW1 and PW2) had passed a valid resolution authorizing the suit, giving the company the necessary standing.
Judgment
The Court found in favour of the Plaintiff and granted the following reliefs:
- An account and/or payment of RM773,695.61 (CIDB funds) and AUD128,373.08 (WAST funds) if not accounted within 90 days.
- Damages for negligence, breach of duty, and conspiracy (to be assessed).
- Aggravated and exemplary damages (to be assessed).
- Interest at 5% per annum on the awarded sums until full settlement.
- Costs of RM50,000 against the defendants.
Legal Principles Affirmed
- Director’s Duties: Directors are fiduciaries and must act with care, diligence, and loyalty. Misuse of funds, failure to account, or acting in self-interest breaches these duties.
- Implied Duty of Fidelity: Even without a formal employment contract, fiduciary obligations can arise from a director’s role and responsibilities.
- Corporate Governance: Proper documentation, transparency in financial affairs, and compliance with statutory duties are critical to corporate integrity.
- Conspiracy in Civil Law: Requires proof of intent and concerted action, which can be established on a balance of probabilities, not beyond reasonable doubt.
- Company’s Right to Sue: A company has the right to enforce its legal rights, especially when authorized by majority shareholders, without the need for a derivative action.
Conclusion
This case serves as a cautionary tale on the dangers of poor internal controls and unchecked power within a company. Directors and senior employees must act in the best interests of the company, and failure to do so can lead to serious legal repercussions—including personal liability for financial losses and reputational damage.
The High Court’s ruling in WA Skills Training Malaysia Sdn Bhd v. Nurain & Anor is a strong reaffirmation of the importance of accountability, governance, and ethical conduct in the corporate sector.
Consult us for more information!
🌐 Call us: 03-2202 1021 / 017-6965 966 (WhatsApp)
📩 Email Us: nick@jykolaw.com
Or fill in the contact form CLICK HERE
Disclaimer: The above proposition is subject to actual facts and circumstances and shall never be referred as the actual law without seeking legal advice. Consult us for more information!