Get In Touch With Us For Your Legal Issues

Employers Suing Employees for Negligence and Theft – Malaysian Law

Introduction

In today’s business landscape, the relationship between employer and employee is governed by legal obligations, mutual trust, and accountability. While most employees perform their duties diligently, there are unfortunate instances where employers suffer financial or reputational losses due to employee negligence or, worse, theft. In Malaysia, these acts are not only serious breaches of the employment contract but can also lead to civil and criminal actions against the offending employees.

This article explores in depth the Malaysian legal framework surrounding employers suing employees for negligence and theft of company property, examining relevant laws, case studies, procedures, and best practices for both prevention and enforcement.


Table of Contents

  1. Understanding Employer-Employee Legal Obligations in Malaysia
  2. What Constitutes Employee Negligence Under Malaysian Law?
  3. Employer’s Legal Rights Against Negligent Employees
  4. Theft of Company Property: Definition and Legal Ramifications
  5. Relevant Legislation for Civil and Criminal Actions
  6. Case Law Analysis: Malaysian Precedents
  7. Steps Employers Must Take Before Suing an Employee
  8. Civil Action vs. Criminal Prosecution: Choosing the Right Legal Path
  9. Evidentiary Requirements in Civil Suits for Negligence or Theft
  10. Role of Internal Disciplinary Proceedings
  11. Injunctions and Recovery of Stolen Property
  12. Damages Recoverable by Employers
  13. Alternative Dispute Resolution Options
  14. Defenses Available to Employees
  15. Preventive Measures Employers Should Implement
  16. Implications for HR Policies and Contracts
  17. Statutory Limitations for Bringing a Lawsuit
  18. Best Practices for Employers Pursuing Legal Action
  19. How Employment Lawyers in Malaysia Can Help
  20. Conclusion: Legal Remedies and Strategic Considerations

1. Understanding Employer-Employee Legal Obligations in Malaysia

The Contractual Relationship

The employment relationship in Malaysia is primarily governed by the Employment Act 1955 (Act 265), for employees earning below a certain wage threshold. For others, the contract of employment determines the rights and duties of both parties.

Employees owe a duty of:

  • Care and diligence
  • Loyalty and honesty
  • Not to misuse company property
  • Obedience to lawful and reasonable instructions

Employers, in turn, must provide safe working conditions, fair wages, and ensure legal compliance.


2. What Constitutes Employee Negligence Under Malaysian Law?

Negligence refers to a failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in damage or loss to another party.

Examples in Employment Context

  • Leaving company equipment unsecured, leading to theft
  • Failure to follow safety protocols, causing accidents
  • Making costly errors due to lack of attention

Under Malaysian tort law, negligence requires proving:

  1. Duty of care
  2. Breach of that duty
  3. Causation
  4. Damage or loss suffered

3. Employer’s Legal Rights Against Negligent Employees

Subject to the employment contract, an employer has the legal right to:

  • Terminate the employee for gross misconduct or negligence
  • Sue for damages caused by the negligent act
  • Seek indemnity where a contract provides for it
  • File a police report if criminal elements are involved

4. Theft of Company Property: Definition and Legal Ramifications

Theft is a criminal offence under Section 378 of the Penal Code. If an employee dishonestly takes company property with intent to permanently deprive the company, it constitutes criminal theft.

Examples include:

  • Stealing cash, laptops, or stock items
  • Misappropriating company funds
  • Unauthorized use of corporate credit cards

5. Relevant Legislation for Civil and Criminal Actions

Civil Laws

  • Employment Act 1955
  • Contract Act 1950
  • Tort law (negligence)
  • Companies Act 2016 (for directors or senior management)

Criminal Laws

  • Penal Code (Sections 378, 403, 405, 409)
  • Criminal Procedure Code

6. Case Law Analysis: Malaysian Precedents

Case: Malayan Banking Bhd v. Lee Ah Moi [1981]

An employee’s negligence in processing transactions led to substantial loss. The court held the employee liable under the tort of negligence.

Case: PP v. Zainuddin [1991]

Employee convicted for criminal breach of trust under Section 409 of the Penal Code for misappropriating funds.

These cases show that both civil and criminal avenues are available, depending on the facts.


7. Steps Employers Should Take Before Suing an Employee

Before pursuing legal action, employers should:

  1. Conduct an internal investigation
  2. Gather documentary and witness evidence
  3. Issue a show cause letter
  4. Hold a domestic inquiry
  5. Make a police report (if theft is involved)
  6. Consult a lawyer for legal advice

8. Civil Action vs. Criminal Prosecution: Choosing the Right Legal Path

Civil Action

  • Recover financial losses
  • Lower burden of proof (“balance of probabilities”)
  • May result in damages, injunctions

Criminal Prosecution

  • Punitive action (fine, imprisonment)
  • Higher burden of proof (“beyond reasonable doubt”)
  • Can proceed with or without employer consent

Employers may opt for both, especially in high-value theft cases.


9. Evidentiary Requirements in Civil Suits for Negligence or Theft

To succeed in a lawsuit, employers may show:

  • Existence of duty (employment contract, job scope)
  • Breach of duty (e.g., failure to safeguard assets)
  • Losses suffered (audit reports, financial statements)
  • Link between breach and losses

In theft cases, CCTV footage, eyewitnesses, and audit trails are key.


10. Role of Internal Disciplinary Proceedings (Domestic Inquiry)

Domestic Inquiry helps to establish:

  • Whether misconduct occurred
  • If dismissal is justified
  • Evidence base for later civil litigation

It also supports compliance with natural justice and procedural fairness.


11. Injunctions and Recovery of Stolen Property

Courts may grant injunctions to:

  • Freeze the employee’s assets
  • Prevent sale of stolen items
  • Compel the return of company property

Applications must be supported by affidavits and clear evidence.


12. Damages Recoverable by Employers

Employers may claim:

  • Compensatory damages for financial loss
  • Punitive damages (in certain fraud cases)
  • Costs of investigation
  • Legal costs

Quantification must be supported by audits, invoices, and financial reports.


13. Alternative Dispute Resolution Options

Mediation or Arbitration

  • Useful for lower-value or sensitive cases
  • Private and cost-effective
  • Often faster than court litigation

This depends on employment contract provisions or mutual agreement.


14. Defenses Available to Employees

Employees may defend themselves by claiming:

  • No negligence occurred
  • Employer was partly at fault (contributory negligence)
  • No criminal intent (in theft cases)
  • Evidence is inconclusive

Legal representation is crucial, especially in criminal trials.


15. Preventive Measures Employers Should Implement

Employers should consider:

  • Detailed job descriptions and contracts
  • Regular audits and asset checks
  • IT monitoring systems
  • Whistleblower policies
  • Mandatory leave to detect fraud

These measures help minimize risk and support legal claims later.


16. Implications for HR Policies and Contracts

Employment contracts should clearly define:

  • Employee responsibilities
  • Disciplinary procedures
  • Confidentiality clauses
  • Liability for negligence or misconduct
  • Dispute resolution mechanisms

Handbooks and policy manuals should be updated regularly.


17. Statutory Limitations for Bringing a Lawsuit

Under the Limitation Act 1953, the time limit to sue an employee is:

  • 6 years from the date the cause of action arose (for negligence suits)
  • No specific time bar for criminal theft, although prompt action is advisable

Late filing may result in dismissal of the suit.


18. Best Practices for Employers Pursuing Legal Action

  1. Act promptly upon discovery of wrongdoing
  2. Document everything
  3. Conduct fair inquiries
  4. Engage employment or litigation lawyers
  5. Avoid retaliatory behavior
  6. Prepare for media or employee fallout

A structured response can save costs and protect the company’s reputation.


19. How Employment Lawyers in Malaysia Can Help

Employment lawyers assist by:

  • Advising on legal strategy
  • Drafting show cause letters
  • Conducting domestic inquiries
  • Filing civil suits or liaising with police
  • Representing employers in court

Hiring a qualified lawyer is essential to protect your business interests.


20. Conclusion: Legal Remedies and Strategic Considerations

Employers in Malaysia have a variety of legal tools to address employee negligence or theft of company property. By understanding their rights under civil and criminal law, conducting proper investigations, and working with legal experts, employers can recover losses and deter future misconduct.

The key lies in combining robust preventive measures, clear contractual obligations, and timely legal action. Whether through lawsuits, arbitration, or police reports, companies must take such misconduct seriously to maintain integrity and financial security.

Consult us for more information!

🌐 Call us: 03-2202 1021 / 017-6965 966 (WhatsApp)

📩 Email Us: nick@jykolaw.com

Or fill in the contact form CLICK HERE

Disclaimer: The above proposition is subject to actual facts and circumstances and shall never be referred as the actual law without seeking legal advice. Consult us for more information!